Volume 41 Issue 6
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yunlong Chen, Xiujuan Shan, Dingyong Zeng, Harry Gorfine, Yinfeng Xu, Qiang Wu, Tao Yang, Xianshi Jin. Estimating seasonal habitat suitability for migratory species in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea: A case study of Tanaka’s snailfish (Liparis tanakae)[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(6): 22-30. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1912-1
Citation: Yunlong Chen, Xiujuan Shan, Dingyong Zeng, Harry Gorfine, Yinfeng Xu, Qiang Wu, Tao Yang, Xianshi Jin. Estimating seasonal habitat suitability for migratory species in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea: A case study of Tanaka’s snailfish (Liparis tanakae)[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(6): 22-30. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1912-1

Estimating seasonal habitat suitability for migratory species in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea: A case study of Tanaka’s snailfish (Liparis tanakae)

doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1912-1
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 42176151; the Youth Talent Program Supported by Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) under contract No. 2018-MFS-T05; the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences under contract Nos 20603022019010 and 20603022022022.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: shanxj@ysfri.ac.cn
  • Received Date: 2021-06-14
  • Accepted Date: 2021-08-03
  • Available Online: 2022-05-10
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-16
  • Acquiring a comprehensive and accurate understanding of habitat preference is essential for species conservation and fishery management, especially for mobile species that migrate seasonally. Presence and absence data from field surveys are recommended when available due to their high reliability. Using field survey data, we investigated seasonal habitat suitability requirements for Tanaka’s snailfish (Liparis tanakae) in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea (BSYS) via a machine-learning method, random forests (RFs). Five environmental and biologically relevant variables (bottom temperature, bottom salinity, current velocity, depth and distance to shore) were used to build the ecological niches between the presence/absence data and suitable habitat. In addition, the degree to which false absence data might impact model performance was evaluated. Our results indicated that RFs provided accurate predictions, with seasonal habitat suitability maps of L. tanakae differing substantially. Bottom temperature and salinity were identified as important factors influencing the distribution of L. tanakae. False absence data were found to have negative effects on model performance and the decrease in evaluation metrics was usually significant (P<0.05) after 30% or more errors were added to the absence data. Through identifying highly suitable areas within its geographic range, our study provides a baseline for L. tanakae that can be further applied in ecosystem modelling and fishery management in the BSYS.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, Kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(6): 1223–1232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
    [2]
    Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert C H, et al. 2012. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(2): 327–338. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00172.x
    [3]
    Basher Z, Bowden D A, Costello M J. 2018. Global Marine Environment Datasets (GMED). Version 2.0 (Rev. 02.2018). http://gmed.auckland.ac.nz [2018-07-09/2020-09-19]
    [4]
    Becker L R, Bartholomä A, Singer A, et al. 2020. Small-scale distribution modeling of benthic species in a protected natural hard ground area in the German North Sea (Helgoländer Steingrund). Geo-Marine Letters, 40(2): 167–181. doi: 10.1007/s00367-019-00598-8
    [5]
    Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1): 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    [6]
    Brotons L, Thuiller W, Araújo M B, et al. 2004. Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography, 27(4): 437–448. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03764.x
    [7]
    Chen Dagang. 1991. Fishery Ecology of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea (in Chinese). Beijing: China Ocean Press, 383–386
    [8]
    Chen Yunlong, Shan Xiujuan, Jin Xianshi, et al. 2018. Changes in fish diversity and community structure in the central and southern Yellow Sea from 2003 to 2015. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 36(3): 805–817. doi: 10.1007/s00343-018-6287-6
    [9]
    Chen Yunlong, Shan Xiujuan, Ovando D, et al. 2021. Predicting current and future global distribution of black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii) under changing climate. Ecological Indicators, 128: 107799. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107799
    [10]
    Chen Yunlong, Shan Xiujuan, Zhou Zhipeng, et al. 2013. Interannual variation in the population dynamics of snailfish Liparis tanakae in the Yellow Sea. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(19): 6227–6235. doi: 10.5846/stxb201304170731
    [11]
    Chernova N V, Stein D L, Andriashev A P. 2004. Family Liparidae Scopoli 1777—snailfishes. In: Annotated Check lists of Fishes. No. 31. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences, 1–72
    [12]
    Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1): 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
    [13]
    Comte L, Grenouillet G. 2013. Species distribution modelling and imperfect detection: comparing occupancy versus consensus methods. Diversity and Distributions, 19(8): 996–1007. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12078
    [14]
    Cutler D R, Edwards Jr T C J, Beard K H, et al. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 88(11): 2783–2792. doi: 10.1890/07-0539.1
    [15]
    Elith J, Leathwick J R, Hastie T. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77(4): 802–813. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
    [16]
    Fernandes R F, Scherrer D, Guisan A. 2019. Effects of simulated observation errors on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 25(3): 400–413. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12868
    [17]
    Fu Caihong, Olsen N, Taylor N, et al. 2017. Spatial and temporal dynamics of predator-prey species interactions off western Canada. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74(8): 2107–2119. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx056
    [18]
    Gibson L, Barrett B, Burbidge A. 2007. Dealing with uncertain absences in habitat modelling: a case study of a rare ground-dwelling parrot. Diversity and Distributions, 13(6): 704–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00365.x
    [19]
    Guo Yanning, Xu Zhen, Zhang Luping, et al. 2014. Occurrence of Hysterothylacium and Anisakis nematodes (Ascaridida: Ascaridoidea) in the tanaka’s snailfish Liparis tanakae (Gilbert & Burke) (Scorpaeniformes: Liparidae). Parasitology Research, 113(4): 1289–1300. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3767-2
    [20]
    Hanley J A, McNeil B J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1): 29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
    [21]
    Hao Tianxiao, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, et al. 2019. A review of evidence about use and performance of species distribution modelling ensembles like BIOMOD. Diversity and Distributions, 25(5): 839–852. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12892
    [22]
    Hecke T V. 2012. Power study of anova versus Kruskal-Wallis test. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 15(2–3): 241–247. doi: 10.1080/09720510.2012.10701623
    [23]
    Jin Xianshi, Tang Qisheng. 1996. Changes in fish species diversity and dominant species composition in the Yellow Sea. Fisheries Research, 26(3–4): 337–352. doi: 10.1016/0165-7836(95)00422-X
    [24]
    Jin Xianshi, Xu Binduo, Tang Qisheng. 2003. Fish assemblage structure in the East China Sea and southern Yellow Sea during autumn and spring. Journal of Fish Biology, 62(5): 1194–1205. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00116.x
    [25]
    Jin Xianshi, Zhang Bo, Xue Ying. 2010. The response of the diets of four carnivorous fishes to variations in the Yellow Sea ecosystem. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(11–12): 996–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.001
    [26]
    Lauria V, Gristina M, Attrill M J, et al. 2015. Predictive habitat suitability models to aid conservation of elasmobranch diversity in the central Mediterranean Sea. Scientific Reports, 5: 13245. doi: 10.1038/srep13245
    [27]
    Lobo J M, Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal J. 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography, 33: 103–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x
    [28]
    Manceur A M, Kühn I. 2014. Inferring model-based probability of occurrence from preferentially sampled data with uncertain absences using expert knowledge. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(8): 739–750. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.12224
    [29]
    Marx M, Quillfeldt P. 2018. Species distribution models of European Turtle Doves in Germany are more reliable with presence only rather than presence absence data. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 16898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35318-2
    [30]
    Melnychuk M C, Peterson E, Elliott M, et al. 2017. Fisheries management impacts on target species status. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(1): 178–183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609915114
    [31]
    Molloy S W, Davis R A, Dunlop J A, et al. 2017. Applying surrogate species presences to correct sample bias in species distribution models: a case study using the Pilbara population of the Northern Quoll. Nature Conservation, 18: 27–46. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.18.12235
    [32]
    Park J M, Kwak S N, Huh S H, et al. 2017. Diets and niche overlap among nine co-occurring demersal fishes in the southern continental shelf of East/Japan Sea, Korea. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 143: 100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.06.002
    [33]
    Phillips N D, Reid N, Thys T, et al. 2017. Applying species distribution modelling to a data poor, pelagic fish complex: the ocean sunfishes. Journal of Biogeography, 44(10): 2176–2187. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13033
    [34]
    Pons M, Melnychuk M C, Hilborn R. 2018. Management effectiveness of large pelagic fisheries in the high seas. Fish and Fisheries, 19(2): 260–270. doi: 10.1111/faf.12253
    [35]
    Record S, Strecker A, Tuanmu M N, et al. 2018. Does scale matter? A systematic review of incorporating biological realism when predicting changes in species distributions. PLoS ONE, 13(4): e0194650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194650
    [36]
    Rubio I, Ganzedo U, Hobday A J, et al. 2020. Southward re-distribution of tropical tuna fisheries activity can be explained by technological and management change. Fish and Fisheries, 21(3): 511–521,
    [37]
    Sarquis J A, Cristaldi M A, Arzamendia V, et al. 2018. Species distribution models and empirical test: comparing predictions with well-understood geographical distribution of Bothrops alternatus in Argentina. Ecology and Evolution, 8(21): 10497–10509. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4517
    [38]
    Schickele A, Leroy B, Beaugrand G, et al. 2020. Modelling European small pelagic fish distribution: Methodological insights. Ecological Modelling, 416: 108902. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108902
    [39]
    Soberón J, Nakamura M. 2009. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(S2): 19644–19650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901637106
    [40]
    Tanaka K R, Torre M P, Saba V S, et al. 2020. An ensemble high-resolution projection of changes in the future habitat of American lobster and sea scallop in the Northeast US continental shelf. Diversity and Distributions, 26(7): 987–1001. doi: 10.1111/ddi.13069
    [41]
    Thuiller W, Georges D, Gueguen M, et al. 2016. Biomod2: Ensemble platform for species distribution modeling. https://cran.r-project.org/package=biomod2 [2021-06-11/2021-07-22]
    [42]
    Tomiyama T, Uehara S, Kurita Y. 2013a. Feeding relationships among fishes in shallow sandy areas in relation to stocking of Japanese flounder. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 479: 163–175. doi: 10.3354/meps10191
    [43]
    Tomiyama T, Yamada M, Yoshida T. 2013b. Seasonal migration of the snailfish Liparis tanakae and their habitat overlap with 0-year-old Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 93(7): 1981–1987. doi: 10.1017/S0025315413000544
    [44]
    Wan Ruijing, Jiang Yanwei. 2000. The species and biological characteristics of the eggs and larvae of osteichthyes in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea. Journal of Shanghai Fisheries University, 9(4): 290–297
    [45]
    Wang Fan, Liu Chuanyu. 2009. An N-shape thermal front in the western South Yellow Sea in winter. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 27(4): 898. doi: 10.1007/s00343-009-9045-y
    [46]
    Wisz M S, Broennimann O, Grønkjær P, et al. 2015. Arctic warming will promote Atlantic-Pacific fish interchange. Nature Climate Change, 5(3): 261–265. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2500
    [47]
    Zhang Bo, Jin Xianshi, Dai Fangqun. 2011. Feeding habits and their variation of seasnail (Liparis tanakae) in the central and southern Yellow Sea. Journal of Fisheries of China, 35(8): 1199–1207
    [48]
    Zhong Mingyu, Wu Huifeng, Mi Wenying, et al. 2018. Occurrences and distribution characteristics of organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers in the sediments of the Bohai and Yellow Seas, China. Science of The Total Environment, 615: 1305–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.272
    [49]
    Zhou Zhipeng, Jin Xianshi, Shan Xiujuan, et al. 2012. Seasonal variations in distribution and biological characteristics of snailfish Liparis tanakae in the central and southern Yellow Sea. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(17): 5550–5561. doi: 10.5846/stxb201108061152
  • 41-06-Chen Yunlong-Supplementary information.pdf
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (82) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return