Volume 42 Issue 12
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wen Ma, Ling Ding, Xinghua Wu, Chunxia Gao, Jin Ma, Jing Zhao. Impacts of data sources on the predictive performance of species distribution models: a case study for Scomber japonicus in the offshore waters southern Zhejiang, China[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2024, 43(12): 113-122. doi: 10.1007/s13131-024-2387-7
Citation: Wen Ma, Ling Ding, Xinghua Wu, Chunxia Gao, Jin Ma, Jing Zhao. Impacts of data sources on the predictive performance of species distribution models: a case study for Scomber japonicus in the offshore waters southern Zhejiang, China[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2024, 43(12): 113-122. doi: 10.1007/s13131-024-2387-7

Impacts of data sources on the predictive performance of species distribution models: a case study for Scomber japonicus in the offshore waters southern Zhejiang, China

doi: 10.1007/s13131-024-2387-7
Funds:  The Research Project of China Yangtze River Three Gorges Group Limited under contract No. 201903173; the Zhejiang Mariculture Research Institute of China under contract No. 325000.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: jma@shou.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2024-04-28
  • Accepted Date: 2024-09-12
  • Available Online: 2025-01-11
  • Publish Date: 2024-12-01
  • As our understanding of ecology deepens and modeling techniques advance, species distribution models have grown increasingly sophisticated, enhancing both their fitting and predictive capabilities. However, the dependability of predictive accuracy remains a critical issue, as the precision of these predictions largely hinges on the quality of the base data. We developed models using both field survey and remote sensing data from 2016 to 2020 to evaluate the impact of different data sources on the accuracy of predictions for Scomber japonicus distributions. Our research findings indicate that the variability of water temperature and salinity data from field suvery is significantly greater than that from remote sensing data. Within the same season, we found that the relationship between the abundance of S. japonicus and environmental factors varied significantly depending on the data source. Models using field survey data were able to more accurately reflect the complex relationships between resource distribution and environmental factors. Additionally, in terms of model predictive performance, models based on field survey data demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting the abundance of S. japonicus compared to those based on remote sensing data, allowing for more accurate mastery of their spatial distribution characteristics. This study highlights the significant impact of data sources on the accuracy of species distribution models and offers valuable insights for fisheries resources management.
  • loading
  • Akaike H. 1998. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G, eds. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 199–213
    Cai Kai, Kindong R, Ma Qiuyun, et al. 2022. Growth heterogeneity of Chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) in the Northwest Pacific Ocean. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2): 301, doi: 10.3390/jmse10020301
    Chen Xinjun, Li Gang, Feng Bo, et al. 2009. Habitat suitability index of Chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) from July to September in the East China Sea. Journal of Oceanography, 65(1): 93–102, doi: 10.1007/s10872-009-0009-9
    Chen Weifeng, Peng Xin, Wang Zhenhua, et al. 2017. Community structure characteristics of fishes in the coastal area of south Zhejiang during autumn and winter. Ocean Development and Management (in Chinese), 34(11): 111–119
    Cui Ke, Chen Xinjun. 2007. Study of the relationships between SST and mackerel abundances in the Yellow and East China Seas. South China Fisheries Science (in Chinese), 3(4): 20–25
    Dai Libin, Hodgdon C, Tian Siquan, et al. 2020. Comparative performance of modelling approaches for predicting fish species richness in the Yangtze River Estuary. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 35: 101161, doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101161
    Deng Jingyao, Zhao Chuanyan. 1991. Marine Fisheries Biology (in Chinese). Beijing: Agriculture Publishing Press
    General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. 2007a. GB/T 12763.6-2007 Specifications for Oceanographic Survey-Part 6: Marine Biological Survey (in Chinese). Beijing: China Standards Press
    General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. 2007b. GB 17378.3-2007 The Specification for Marine Monitoring-Part 3: Sample Collection, Storage and Transportation (in Chinese). Beijing: China Standards Press
    Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort J J, Elith J, et al. 2015. Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24(3): 276–292, doi: 10.1111/geb.12268
    Guisan A, Zimmermann N E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135(2/3): 147–186, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
    Han Dongyan, Kindong R, Wang Wen, et al. 2024. Effects of jellyfish and black seabream releasing on marine ecosystems: A mass balance approach for the coastal area of southern Zhejiang, China. Ocean & Coastal Management, 248: 106948, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106948
    Hiyama Y, Yoda M, Ohshimo S. 2002. Stock size fluctuations in chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) in the East China Sea and the Japan/East Sea. Fisheries Oceanography, 11(6): 347–353, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2002.00217.x
    Johnston M R, Elmore A J, Mokany K, et al. 2017. Field-measured variables outperform derived alternatives in Maryland stream biodiversity models. Diversity and Distributions, 23(9): 1054–1066, doi: 10.1111/ddi.12598
    La Marca W, Elith J, Firth R S C, et al. 2019. The influence of data source and species distribution modelling method on spatial conservation priorities. Diversity and Distributions, 25(7): 1060–1073, doi: 10.1111/ddi.12924
    Lei Lin, Wang Jintao, Chen Xinjun. 2022. Influence of environmental data of different sources on marine species habitat modeling: A case study for Ommastrephes bartramii in the Northwest Pacific Ocean. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 41(1): 76–83, doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1896-x
    Li Gang, Chen Xinjun. 2009. Study on the relationship between catch of mackerel and environmental factors in the East China Sea in summer. Journal of Marine Sciences, 27(1): 1–8.
    Li Gang, Chen Xinjun, Lei Lin, et al. 2014. Distribution of hotspots of Chub mackerel based on remote-sensing data in coastal waters of China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(11/12): 4399–4421, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2014.916057
    Li Bai, Cao Jie, Chang J H, et al. 2015. Evaluation of effectiveness of fixed-station sampling for monitoring American lobster settlement. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 35(5): 942–957, doi: 10.1080/02755947.2015.1074961
    Liu Xiaoxue, Gao Chunxia, Zhao Jing, et al. 2021. Modeling and comparison of count data containing zero values: a case study of Setipinna taty in the south inshore of Zhejiang, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(34): 46827–46837, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13440-5
    Liu Xiaoxiao, Wang Jing, Zhang Yunlei, et al. 2019. Comparison between two GAMs in quantifying the spatial distribution of Hexagrammos otakii in Haizhou Bay, China. Fisheries Research, 218: 209–217, doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2019.05.019
    Luan Jing, Zhang Chongliang, Ji Yupeng, et al. 2021. Matching data types to the objectives of species distribution modeling: An evaluation with marine fish species. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8: 771071, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.771071
    Luan Jing, Zhang Chongliang, Xu Binduo, et al. 2018. Modelling the spatial distribution of three Portunidae crabs in Haizhou Bay, China. PLoS One, 13(11): e0207457, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207457
    Ma Wen, Gao Chunxia, Qin Song, et al. 2022a. Do two different approaches to the season in modeling affect the predicted distribution of fish? A case study for Decapterus maruadsi in the offshore waters of southern Zhejiang, China. Fishes, 7(4): 153, doi: 10.3390/fishes7040153
    Ma Wen, Gao Chunxia, Tang Wei, et al. 2022b. Relationship between Engraulis japonicus resources and environmental factors based on multi-model comparison in offshore waters of Southern Zhejiang, China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(5): 657, doi: 10.3390/jmse10050657
    Ma Jin, Li Bai, Zhao Jing, et al. 2020. Environmental influences on the spatio-temporal distribution of Coilia nasus in the Yangtze River estuary. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 36(3): 315–325, doi: 10.1111/jai.14028
    Pan Shaoyuan, Tian Siquan, Wang Xuefang, et al. 2021. Comparing different spatial interpolation methods to predict the distribution of fishes: A case study of Coilia nasus in the Changjiang River Estuary. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 40(8): 119–132, doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1789-z
    Pennino M G, Coll M, Albo-Puigserver M, et al. 2020. Current and future influence of environmental factors on small pelagic fish distributions in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7: 622, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00622
    Queiros Q, Fromentin J M, Gasset E, et al. 2019. Food in the sea: size also matters for pelagic fish. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6: 385, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00385
    Sagarese S R, Frisk M G, Cerrato R M, et al. 2014. Application of generalized additive models to examine ontogenetic and seasonal distributions of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast (US) shelf large marine ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 71(6): 847–877, doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0342
    Scales K L, Hazen E L, Jacox M G, et al. 2017. Scale of inference: on the sensitivity of habitat models for wide-ranging marine predators to the resolution of environmental data. Ecography, 40(1): 210–220, doi: 10.1111/ecog.02272
    Selleslagh J, Amara R. 2008. Environmental factors structuring fish composition and assemblages in a small macrotidal estuary (eastern English Channel). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 79(3): 507–517, doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.006
    Stock A, Subramaniam A. 2020. Accuracy of empirical satellite algorithms for mapping phytoplankton diagnostic pigments in the open ocean: a supervised learning perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7: 599, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00599
    Stow C A, Jolliff J, McGillicuddy Jr D J, et al. 2009. Skill assessment for coupled biological/physical models of marine systems. Journal of Marine Systems, 76(1/2): 4–15, doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.03.011
    Wang Junbang, Ding Yuefan, Wang Shaoqiang, et al. 2022. Pixel-scale historical-baseline-based ecological quality: Measuring impacts from climate change and human activities from 2000 to 2018 in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 313: 114944, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114944
    Welch H, Brodie S, Jacox M G, et al. 2020. Considerations for transferring an operational dynamic ocean management tool between ocean color products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 242: 111753, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111753
    Willmott C J, Matsuura K. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30(1): 79–82, doi: 10.3354/cr030079
    Wu Xiaojing, He Honglin, Zhang Li, et al. 2022. Spatial sampling design optimization of monitoring network for terrestrial ecosystem in China. Science of the Total Environment, 847: 157397, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157397
    Xue Ying, Tanaka K, Yu Huaming, et al. 2018. Using a new framework of two-phase generalized additive models to incorporate prey abundance in spatial distribution models of juvenile slender lizardfish in Haizhou Bay, China. Marine Biology Research, 14(5): 508–523, doi: 10.1080/17451000.2018.1447673
    Yasuda T, Yukami R, Ohshimo S. 2014. Fishing ground hotspots reveal long-term variation in chub mackerel Scomber japonicus habitat in the East China Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 501: 239–250, doi: 10.3354/meps10679
    Yu Hao, Cooper A R, Infante D M. 2020. Improving species distribution model predictive accuracy using species abundance: Application with boosted regression trees. Ecological Modelling, 432: 109202, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109202
    Yu Wei, Guo Ai, Zhang Yang, et al. 2018. Climate-induced habitat suitability variations of chub mackerel Scomber japonicus in the East China Sea. Fisheries Research, 207: 63–73, doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.06.007
    Zhang Qiuhua, Cheng Jiahua, Xu Hanxiang, et al. 2017. Fishery Resources and Sustainable Utilization in the East China Sea (in Chinese). Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 212–219
    Zhang Yunlei, Xue Ying, Xu Binduo, et al. 2021. Evaluating the effect of input variables on quantifying the spatial distribution of croaker Johnius belangerii in Haizhou Bay, China. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 39(4): 1570–1583, doi: 10.1007/s00343-020-0193-4
    Zhang Yunlei, Yu Huaming, Yu Haiqing, et al. 2020. Optimization of environmental variables in habitat suitability modeling for mantis shrimp Oratosquilla oratoria in the Haizhou Bay and adjacent waters. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 39(6): 36–47, doi: 10.1007/s13131-020-1546-8
    Zhao Jing, Cao Jie, Tian Siquan, et al. 2014. A comparison between two GAM models in quantifying relationships of environmental variables with fish richness and diversity indices. Aquatic Ecology, 48(3): 297–312, doi: 10.1007/s10452-014-9484-1
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (55) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return