FIO-ESM v2.0 CORE2-forced experiment for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

Qi Shu; Zhenya Song; Ying Bao; Xiaodan Yang; Yajuan Song; Xinfang Li; Meng Wei; Fangli Qiao

doi:10.1007/s13131-022-2000-x

Volume 41 Issue 10

Oct. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Acta Oceanologica Sinica > 2022 > 41(10): 22-31

Qi Shu, Zhenya Song, Ying Bao, Xiaodan Yang, Yajuan Song, Xinfang Li, Meng Wei, Fangli Qiao. FIO-ESM v2.0 CORE2-forced experiment for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(10): 22-31. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2000-x

Citation:

Qi Shu, Zhenya Song, Ying Bao, Xiaodan Yang, Yajuan Song, Xinfang Li, Meng Wei, Fangli Qiao. FIO-ESM v2.0 CORE2-forced experiment for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(10): 22-31. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2000-x

Citation:

Qi Shu, Zhenya Song, Ying Bao, Xiaodan Yang, Yajuan Song, Xinfang Li, Meng Wei, Fangli Qiao. FIO-ESM v2.0 CORE2-forced experiment for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(10): 22-31. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2000-x

PDF( 3398 KB)

FIO-ESM v2.0 CORE2-forced experiment for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2000-x

Qi Shu^{1, 2, 3},
Zhenya Song^{1, 2, 3},
Ying Bao^{1, 2, 3},
Xiaodan Yang^{1, 2, 3},
Yajuan Song^{1, 2, 3},
Xinfang Li¹,
Meng Wei^{1, 2, 3},
Fangli Qiao^{1, 2, 3
,
,}

1.
First Institute of Oceanography, and Key Laboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China
2.
Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
3.
Shandong Key Laboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao 266061, China

Funds: The National Key R&D Program of China under contract Nos 2018YFA0605701 and 2016YFB0201100; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 41941012 and 41821004; the Basic Scientiﬁc Fund for National Public Research Institute of China (ShuXingbei Young Talent Program) under contract No. 2019S06.

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: qiaofl@fio.org.cn
Received Date: 2021-09-16
Accepted Date: 2021-11-29

Available Online: 2022-05-11

Publish Date: 2022-10-27

Abstract

Abstract

We introduced the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Ocean Model Intercomparison Project CORE2-forced (OMIP-1) experiment by using the First Institute of Oceanography Earth System Model version 2.0 (FIO-ESM v2.0), and comprehensively evaluated the simulation results. Unlike other OMIP models, FIO-ESM v2.0 includes a coupled ocean surface wave component model that takes into account non-breaking surface wave-induced vertical mixing in the ocean and effect of surface wave Stokes drift on air-sea momentum and heat fluxes in the climate system. A sub-layer sea surface temperature (SST) diurnal cycle parameterization was also employed to take into account effect of SST diurnal cycle on air-sea heat ﬂuxes to improve simulations of air-sea interactions. Evaluations show that mean values and long-term trends of significant wave height were adequately reproduced in the FIO-ESM v2.0 OMIP-1 simulations, and there is a reasonable fit between the SST diurnal cycle obtained from in situ observations and that parameterized by FIO-ESM v2.0. Evaluations of model drift, temperature, salinity, mixed layer depth, and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation show that the model performs well in the FIO-ESM v2.0 OMIP-1 simulation. However, the summer sea ice extent of the Arctic and Antarctic is underestimated.
- FIO-ESM,
- OMIP,
- CMIP6,
- OGCM

FullText(HTML)

References(49)

References

Bailey D, Holland M, Hunke E, et al. 2011. Community Ice CodE (CICE) user’s guide version 4.0 released with CCSM 4.0. Tech rep, Los Alamos National Library

Bao Ying, Song Zhenya, Qiao Fangli. 2020. FIO-ESM Version 2.0: Model description and evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125(6): e2019JC016036. doi: 10.1029/2019JC016036

Bernie D J, Guilyardi E, Madec G, et al. 2008. Impact of resolving the diurnal cycle in an ocean-atmosphere GCM: Part 2. A diurnally coupled CGCM. Climate Dynamics, 31(7–8): 909–925. doi: 10.1007/s00382-008-0429-z

Chen Siyu, Qiao Fangli, Huang Chuanjiang, et al. 2018. Effects of the non-breaking surface wave-induced vertical mixing on winter mixed layer depth in subtropical regions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 123(4): 2934–2944. doi: 10.1002/2017JC013038

Clayson C A, Weitlich D. 2007. Variability of tropical diurnal sea surface temperature. Journal of Climate, 20(2): 334–352. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3999.1

Craig A P, Vertenstein M, Jacob R. 2012. A new flexible coupler for earth system modeling developed for CCSM4 and CESM1. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 26(1): 31–42. doi: 10.1177/1094342011428141

Dai Aiguo, Qian Taotao, Trenberth K E, et al. 2009. Changes in continental freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004. Journal of Climate, 22(10): 2773–2792. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1

Dai Aiguo, Trenberth K E. 2002. Estimates of freshwater discharge from continents: Latitudinal and seasonal variations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 3(6): 660–687. doi: 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0660:EOFDFC>2.0.CO;2

Danabasoglu G, Large W G, Tribbia J J, et al. 2006. Diurnal coupling in the tropical oceans of CCSM3. Journal of Climate, 19(11): 2347–2365. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3739.1

Danabasoglu G, Yeager S G, Bailey D, et al. 2014. North Atlantic simulations in coordinated ocean-ice reference experiments phase II (CORE-II): Part I. Mean states. Ocean Modelling, 73: 76–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.10.005

Danabasoglu G, Yeager S G, Kim W M, et al. 2016. North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II): Part II. Inter-annual to decadal variability. Ocean Modelling, 97: 65–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007

de Boyer Montégut C, Madec G, Fischer A S, et al. 2004. Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 109(C12): C12003. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002378

Downes S M, Farneti R, Uotila P, et al. 2015. An assessment of Southern Ocean water masses and sea ice during 1988–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Ocean Modelling, 94: 67–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.022

Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl G A, et al. 2016. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5): 1937–1958. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016

Fetterer F, Knowles K, Meier W, et al. 2017. Sea ice index, version 3. Boulder, CO, USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center,

Frajka-Williams E, Moat B I, Smeed D A, et al. 2021. Atlantic meridional overturning circulation observed by the RAPID-MOCHA-WBTS (RAPID-Meridional Overturning Circulation and Heatflux Array-Western Boundary Time Series) array at 26N from 2004 to 2020 (v2020.1). British Oceanographic Data Centre-Natural Environment Research Council,

Griffies S M, Biastoch A, Böning C, et al. 2009. Coordinated ocean-ice reference experiments (COREs). Ocean Modelling, 26(1–2): 1–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.08.007

Griffies S M, Danabasoglu G, Durack P J, et al. 2016. OMIP contribution to CMIP6: Experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(9): 3231–3296. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016

Ham Y G, Kug J S, Kang I S, et al. 2010. Impact of diurnal atmosphere-ocean coupling on tropical climate simulations using a coupled GCM. Climate Dynamics, 34(6): 905–917. doi: 10.1007/s00382-009-0586-8

Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, et al. 2019. Global reanalysis: Goodbye ERA-Interim, hello ERA5. ECMWF Newsletter 159, 17–24, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/159/meteorology/global-reanalysis-goodbye-era-interim-hello-era5 [2019-04-01/2021-07-16]

Huang Chuanjiang, Qiao Fangli, Dai Dejun. 2014. Evaluating CMIP5 simulations of mixed layer depth during summer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119(4): 2568–2582. doi: 10.1002/2013JC009535

Huang Chuanjiang, Qiao Fangli, Shu Qi, et al. 2012. Evaluating austral summer mixed-layer response to surface wave-induced mixing in the southern Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117(C11): C00J18. doi: 10.1029/2012JC007892

Huang N E. 1971. Derivation of Stokes drift for a deep-water random gravity wave field. Deep-Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 18(2): 255–259. doi: 10.1016/0011-7471(71)90115-X

Ilıcak M, Drange H, Wang Qiang, et al. 2016. An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes. Ocean Modelling, 100: 141–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.02.004

Kawai Y, Wada A. 2007. Diurnal sea surface temperature variation and its impact on the atmosphere and ocean: A review. Journal of Oceanography, 63(5): 721–744. doi: 10.1007/s10872-007-0063-0

Kobayashi S, Ota Y, Harada Y, et al. 2015. The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 93(1): 5–48

Large W G, McWilliams J C, Doney S C. 1994. Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Reviews of Geophysics, 32(4): 363–403. doi: 10.1029/94RG01872

Large W G, Yeager S G. 2009. The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set. Climate Dynamics, 33(2–3): 341–364. doi: 10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3

Locarnini R A, Mishonov A V, Antonov J I, et al. 2013. World ocean atlas 2013. Volume 1: Temperature. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Lumpkin R, Speer K. 2007. Global ocean meridional overturning. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 37(10): 2550–2562. doi: 10.1175/JPO3130.1

Masson S, Terray P, Madec G, et al. 2012. Impact of intra-daily SST variability on ENSO characteristics in a coupled model. Climate Dynamics, 39(3–4): 681–707. doi: 10.1007/s00382-011-1247-2

Qiao Fangli, Song Zhenya, Bao Ying, et al. 2013. Development and evaluation of an Earth System Model with surface gravity waves. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(9): 4514–4524. doi: 10.1002/jgrc.20327

Qiao Fangli, Yuan Yeli, Ezer T, et al. 2010. A three-dimensional surface wave-ocean circulation coupled model and its initial testing. Ocean Dynamics, 60(5): 1339–1355. doi: 10.1007/s10236-010-0326-y

Qiao Fangli, Yuan Yeli, Yang Yongzeng, et al. 2004. Wave-induced mixing in the upper ocean: Distribution and application to a global ocean circulation model. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(11): L11303

Qiao Fangli, Zhao Wei, Yin Xunqiang, et al. 2016. A highly effective global surface wave numerical simulation with ultra-high resolution. In: SC’16: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. Salt Lake City, UT, USA: IEEE, 46–56

Rascle N, Ardhuin F, Queffeulou P, et al. 2008. A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications: Part 1. Wave-current–turbulence interaction parameters for the open ocean based on traditional parameterizations. Ocean Modelling, 25(3–4): 154–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.07.006

Shu Qi, Qiao Fangli, Song Zhenya, et al. 2011. Improvement of MOM4 by including surface wave-induced vertical mixing. Ocean Modelling, 40(1): 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2011.07.005

Shu Qi, Wang Qiang, Su Jie, et al. 2019. Assessment of the Atlantic water layer in the Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 climate models. Climate Dynamics, 53(9–10): 5279–5291. doi: 10.1007/s00382-019-04870-6

Smith R, Jones P, Briegleb B P, et al. 2010. The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM), https://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/ocean/doc/sci/POPRefManual.pdf [2010-03-23/2021-06-01]

Song Z, Qiao F, Bao Y, et al. 2020. FIO-QLNM FIO-ESM2.0 model output prepared for CMIP6 OMIP OMIP 1. Version 20200324. Earth System Grid Federation,

Tsujino H, Urakawa L S, Griffies S M, et al. 2020. Evaluation of global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2). Geoscientific Model Development, 13(8): 3643–3708. doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-3643-2020

Tsujino H, Urakawa S, Nakano H, et al. 2018. JRA-55 based surface dataset for driving ocean-sea-ice models (JRA55-do). Ocean Modelling, 130: 79–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.07.002

Wang Shizhu, Wang Qiang, Shu Qi, et al. 2019. Improving the upper-ocean temperature in an ocean climate model (FESOM 1.4): Shortwave penetration versus mixing induced by nonbreaking surface waves. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(2): 545–557. doi: 10.1029/2018MS001494

Wang Yonggang, Qiao Fangli, Fang Guohong, et al. 2010. Application of wave‐induced vertical mixing to the K profile parameterization scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 115(C9): C09014

Webster P J, Lukas R. 1992. TOGA COARE: the coupled ocean-atmosphere response experiment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 73(9): 1377–1416. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<1377:TCTCOR>2.0.CO;2

Yang Xiaodan, Song Zhenya, Tseng Y H, et al. 2017. Evaluation of three temperature profiles of a sublayer scheme to simulate SST diurnal cycle in a global ocean general circulation model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9(4): 1994–2006. doi: 10.1002/2017MS000927

Young I R, Zieger S, Babanin A V. 2011. Global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science, 332(6028): 451–455. doi: 10.1126/science.1197219

Zhang Jinlun, Rothrock D A. 2003. Modeling global sea ice with a thickness and enthalpy distribution model in generalized curvilinear coordinates. Monthly Weather Review, 131(5): 845–861. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0845:MGSIWA>2.0.CO;2

Zweng M M, Reagan J R, Antonov J I, et al. 2013. World ocean atlas 2013. Volume 2: Salinity. Silver Spring, ML, USA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views