Acoustic characteristics of cold-seep methane bubble behavior in the water column and its potential environmental impact

Jiangong Wei; Tingting Wu; Xiguang Deng; Zongze Yu; Lifeng Wang

doi:10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0

Volume 39 Issue 5

May 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Acta Oceanologica Sinica > 2020 > 39(5): 133-144

Jiangong Wei, Tingting Wu, Xiguang Deng, Zongze Yu, Lifeng Wang. Acoustic characteristics of cold-seep methane bubble behavior in the water column and its potential environmental impact[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020, 39(5): 133-144. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0

Citation:

Jiangong Wei, Tingting Wu, Xiguang Deng, Zongze Yu, Lifeng Wang. Acoustic characteristics of cold-seep methane bubble behavior in the water column and its potential environmental impact[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020, 39(5): 133-144. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0

Citation:

Jiangong Wei, Tingting Wu, Xiguang Deng, Zongze Yu, Lifeng Wang. Acoustic characteristics of cold-seep methane bubble behavior in the water column and its potential environmental impact[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020, 39(5): 133-144. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0

PDF( 1478 KB)

Acoustic characteristics of cold-seep methane bubble behavior in the water column and its potential environmental impact

doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1489-0

Jiangong Wei^{1, 2
,
,},
Tingting Wu^{2
,
,},
Xiguang Deng²,
Zongze Yu²,
Lifeng Wang^{1, 2}

1.
Gas Hydrate Engineering and Technology Center, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 510075, China
2.
MLR Key Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 510075, China

Funds: The National Key Research and Development Plan under contract Nos 2018YFC0310000 and 2016YFC0304905-03; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41602149; China Geological Survey Project under contract Nos DD20190582, DD20191009 and DD20160214.

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: weijiangong007@163.com; wutingtingqd@163.com
Received Date: 2019-04-28
Accepted Date: 2019-07-15

Available Online: 2020-12-28

Publish Date: 2020-05-25

Abstract

Abstract

The amount of methane leaked from deep sea cold seeps is enormous and potentially affects the global warming, ocean acidification and global carbon cycle. It is of great significance to study the methane bubble movement and dissolution process in the water column and its output to the atmosphere. Methane bubbles produce strong acoustic impedance in water bodies, and bubble strings released from deep sea cold seeps are called “gas flares” which expressed as flame-like strong backscatter in the water column. We characterized the morphology and movement of methane bubbles released into the water using multibeam water column data at two cold seeps. The result shows that methane at site I reached 920 m water depth without passing through the top of the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ, 850 m), while methane bubbles at site II passed through the top of the GHSZ (597 m) and entered the non-GHSZ (above 550 m). By applying two methods on the multibeam data, the bubble rising velocity in the water column at sites I and II were estimated to be 9.6 cm/s and 24 cm/s, respectively. Bubble velocity is positively associated with water depth which is inferred to be resulted from decrease of bubble size during methane ascending in the water. Combined with numerical simulation, we concluded that formation of gas hydrate shells plays an important role in helping methane bubbles entering the upper water bodies, while other factors, including water depth, bubble velocity, initial kinetic energy and bubble size, also influence the bubble residence time in the water and the possibility of methane entering the atmosphere. We estimate that methane gas flux at these two sites is 0.4×10⁶–87.6×10⁶ mol/a which is extremely small compared to the total amount of methane in the ocean body, however, methane leakage might exert significant impact on the ocean acidification considering the widespread distributed cold seeps. In addition, although methane entering the atmosphere is not observed, further research is still needed to understand its potential impact on increasing methane concentration in the surface seawater and gas-water interface methane exchange rate, which consequently increase the greenhouse effect.
- gas bubble,
- methane,
- cold seep,
- Nigerian Continental Margin,
- Greenhouse effect,
- Makran accretion wedge

FullText(HTML)

References(57)

References

[1]	Bangs N L, Hornbach M J, Berndt C. 2011. The mechanics of intermittent methane venting at South Hydrate Ridge inferred from 4D seismic surveying. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 310(1): 105–112
[2]	Barnes P M, Lamarche G, Bialas J, et al. 2010. Tectonic and geological framework for gas hydrates and cold seeps on the Hikurangi subduction margin. New Zealand: Marine Geology, 272(1): 26–48
[3]	Berndt C, Feseker T, Treude T,et al. 2014. Temporal constraints on hydrate-controlled methane seepage off Svalbard. Science, 343(6168): 284–287. doi: 10.1126/science.1246298
[4]	Boles J R, Clark J F, Leifer I, et al. 2001. Temporal variation in natural methane seep rate due to tides. Coal Oil Point area, California. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 106(C11): 27077–27086. doi: 10.1029/2000JC000774
[5]	Bourry C, Chazallon B, Charlou J L, et al. 2009. Free gas and gas hydrates from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey: Chemical and structural characterization. Chemical Geology, 264(1–4): 197–206
[6]	Chen Y, Ding J, Zhang H, et al. 2019. Multibeam water column data research in the Taixinan Basin: Implications for the potential occurrence of natural gas hydrate. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(5): 129–133. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1444-0
[7]	Ding L, Zhao M, Yu M, et al. 2017. Biomarker assessments of sources and environmental implications of organic matter in sediments from potential cold seep areas of the northeastern South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(10): 8–19. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1068-1
[8]	Egorov A V, Nigmatulin R I, Rimskii-Korsakov, et al. 2010. Breakup of deep-water methane bubbles. Oceanology, 50(4): 469–478. doi: 10.1134/S000143701004003X
[9]	Egorov A V, Nigmatulin R I, Rozhkov A N, et al. 2012. About transformation of the deep-water methane bubbles into hydrate powder and hydrate foam. Oceanology, 52(2): 194–205. doi: 10.1134/S000143701202004X
[10]	Feng D, Chen D. 2015. Authigenic carbonates from an active cold seep of the northern South China Sea: new insights into fluid sources and past seepage activity. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 122: 74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.02.003
[11]	Fischer D, Sahling H, Nöthen K, et al. 2012. Interaction between hydrocarbon seepage, chemosynthetic communities, and bottom water redox at cold seeps of the Makran accretionary prism: insights from habitat-specific pore water sampling and modeling. Biogeosciences, 9(6): 2013–2031. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-2013-2012
[12]	Greinert J. 2008. Monitoring temporal variability of bubble release at seeps: The hydroacoustic swath system GasQuant. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 113: C07048
[13]	Greinert J, Artemov Y, Egorov V, et al. 2006a. 1300-m-high rising bubbles from mud volcanoes at 2080 m in the Black Sea: Hydroacoustic characteristics and temporal variability. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 244(1): 1–15
[14]	Greinert J, McGinnis D F. 2009. Single bubble dissolution model – The graphical user interface SiBu-GUI. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(8): 1012–1013
[15]	Greinert J, Mcginnis D F, Naudts L, et al. 2010. Atmospheric methane flux from bubbling seeps: Spatially extrapolated quantification from a Black Sea shelf area. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, 115: C01002
[16]	Himmler T, Birgel D, Bayon G, et al. 2015. Formation of seep carbonates along the Makran convergent margin, northern Arabian Sea and a molecular and isotopic approach to constrain the carbon isotopic composition of parent methane. Chemical Geology, 415: 102–117. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.09.016
[17]	Judd A A G, Hovland M. 2007, Seabed Fluid Flow: the Impact of Geology, Biology and the Marine Environment. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
[18]	Judd A G. 2004. Natural seabed gas seeps as sources of atmospheric methane. Environmental Geology, 46(8): 988–996. doi: 10.1007/s00254-004-1083-3
[19]	Judd A G, Hovland M, Dimitrov L I, et al. 2010. The geological methane budget at continental margins and its influence on climate change. Geofluids, 2(2): 109–126
[20]	Klaucke I, Weinrebe W, Petersen C J, et al. 2010. Temporal variability of gas seeps offshore New Zealand: Multi-frequency geoacoustic imaging of the Wairarapa area, Hikurangi margin. Marine Geology, 272(1): 49–58
[21]	Leifer I, Luyendyk B , Boles J, et al. 2006. Natural marine seepage blowout: Contribution to atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20: GB3008
[22]	Lelieveld J, Crutzen P J, Dentener F J. 1998. Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane: Tellus B. Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 50(2): 128–150
[23]	Li C, Gou L, You J, et al. 2016. Further studies on the numerical simulation of bubble plumes in the cold seepage active region. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 35(1): 118–124. doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0803-3
[24]	Liu L, Fu S, Zhang M, et al. 2017. Coupled carbon and sulfur isotope behaviors and other geochemical perspectives into marine methane seepage. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(6): 12–22. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-0998-y
[25]	Loher M, Marcon Y, Pape T, et al. 2018. Seafloor sealing, doming, and collapse associated with gas seeps and authigenic carbonate structures at Venere mud volcano, Central Mediterranean: Deep Sea Research Part I. Oceanographic Research Papers, 137: 76–96. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.04.006
[26]	McGinnis D F, Greinert J, Artemov Y, et al. 2006. Fate of rising methane bubbles in stratified waters: How much methane reaches the atmosphere?. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111: C09007
[27]	Mcneil K. 2009. Considerable methane fluxes to the atmosphere from hydrocarbon seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. Nature Geoscience, 2(8): 561–565
[28]	Muyakshin S I, Sauter E. 2010. The hydroacoustic method for the quantification of the gas flux from a submersed bubble plume. Oceanology, 50(6): 995–1001. doi: 10.1134/S0001437010060202
[29]	Myhre C L, Ferré B, Platt S M, et al. 2016. Extensive release of methane from Arctic seabed west of Svalbard 5 during summer 2014 does not influence the atmosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(9): 4624–4631. doi: 10.1002/2016GL068999
[30]	Nikolovska A, Sahling H, Bohrmann G. 2008. Hydroacoustic methodology for detection, localization, and quantification of gas bubbles rising from the seafloor at gas seeps from the eastern Black Sea. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9: Q10010
[31]	Olsen J E, Dunnebier D, Davies E, et al. 2017. Mass transfer between bubbles and seawater. Chemical Engineering Science, 161: 308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.047
[32]	Römer M, Sahling H, Pape T, et al. 2012. Quantification of gas bubble emissions from submarine hydrocarbon seeps at the Makran continental margin (offshore Pakistan). Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 117: C10015
[33]	Rehder G, Brewer P W, Peltzer E T, et al. 2002a. Enhanced lifetime of methane bubble streams within the deep ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(15): 21–24. doi: 10.1029/2002GL014864
[34]	Rehder G, Collier R W, Heeschen K, et al. 2002b. Enhanced marine CH4 emissions to the atmosphere off Oregon caused by coastal upwelling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16: 3
[35]	Rehder G, Leifer I, Brewer P G,et al. 2009. Controls on methane bubble dissolution inside and outside the hydrate stability field from open ocean field experiments and numerical modeling. Marine Chemistry, 114(1): 19–30
[36]	Riedel M. 2007. 4D seismic time-lapse monitoring of an active cold vent, northern Cascadia margin. Marine Geophysical Researches, 28(4): 355–371. doi: 10.1007/s11001-007-9037-2
[37]	Sauter E J, Muyakshin S I, Charlou J L, et al. 2006. Methane discharge from a deep-sea submarine mud volcano into the upper water column by gas hydrate-coated methane bubbles. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 243(3): 354–365
[38]	Sloan E D, Koh C. 2007. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. New York: CRC Press.
[39]	Solomon E A, Kastner M, MacDonald I R, et al. 2009. Considerable methane fluxes to the atmosphere from hydrocarbon seeps in the Gulf of Mexico. Nature Geosci, 2(8): 561–565. doi: 10.1038/ngeo574
[40]	St Louis V L, Jwm D E R, Rosenberg D M, et al. 2000. Reservoir surfaces as sources of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere: A global estimate. Bioscience, 50(9): 766–775. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0766:RSASOG]2.0.CO;2
[41]	Sultan N, Bohrmann G, Ruffine L, et al. 2014. Pockmark formation and evolution in deep water Nigeria: Rapid hydrate growth versus slow hydrate dissolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(4): 2679–2694. doi: 10.1002/2013JB010546
[42]	Sun S, Liu C, Ye Y, et al. 2014. Pore capillary pressure and saturation of methane hydrate bearing sediments. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 33(10): 30–36. doi: 10.1007/s13131-014-0538-y
[43]	Sun T, Wu D, Yang F, et al. 2019. Sedimentary geochemical proxies for methane seepage at Site C14 in the Qiongdongnan Basin in the northern South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(7): 84–95. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1460-6
[44]	Torres M E, Wallmann K, Tréhu A M, et al. 2004. Gas hydrate growth, methane transport, and chloride enrichment at the southern summit of Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia margin off Oregon. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 226(1–2): 225–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2004.07.029
[45]	Tréhu A M, Stakes D S, Bartlett C D, et al. 2003. Seismic and seafloor evidence for free gas, gas hydrates, and fluid seeps on the transform margin offshore Cape Mendocino. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 108: doi: 10.1029/2001JB001679
[46]	Tréhu A M, Torres M E, Moore G F, et al. 1999. Temporal and spatial evolution of a gas hydrate bearing accretionary ridge on the Oregon continental margin. Geology, 27(10): 939. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0939:TASEOA>2.3.CO;2
[47]	Tryon M D, Brown K M, Torres M E, et al. 1999. Measurements of transience and downward fluid flow near episodic methane gas vents, Hydrate Ridge, Cascadia. Geology, 27(12): 1075–1078. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<1075:MOTADF>2.3.CO;2
[48]	Wang J, Wu S, Xiu K, et al. 2018. Subsurface fluid flow at an active cold seep area in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 168: 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.01.020
[49]	Wei J, Fang Y, Lu H, et al. 2018. Distribution and characteristics of natural gas hydrates in the Shenhu Sea Area, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 98: 622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.07.028
[50]	Wei J, Li J, Wu T, et al. 2020. Geologically controlled intermittent gas eruption and its impact on bottom water temperature and chemosynthetic communities—A case study in the “HaiMa” cold seeps, South China Sea. Geological Journal, : doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3780
[51]	Wei J, Liang J, Lu J, et al. 2019. Characteristics and dynamics of gas hydrate systems in the northwestern South China Sea - Results of the fifth gas hydrate drilling expedition. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 110: 287–298. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.07.028
[52]	Wei J, Pape T, Sultan N, et al. 2015. Gas hydrate distributions in sediments of pockmarks from the Nigerian margin – Results and interpretation from shallow drilling. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 59: 359–370. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.013
[53]	Wu T, Wei J, Liu S, et al. 2019. Characteristics and formation mechanism of seafloor domes on the north-eastern continental slope of the South China Sea. Geological Journal, 55: 1–10
[54]	Ye J, Qin X, Qiu H, et al. 2018. Preliminary results of environmental monitoring of the natural gas hydrate production test in the South China Sea. China Geology, 1(2): 202–209. doi: 10.31035/cg2018029
[55]	Ye J, Wei J, Liang J, et al. 2019. Complex gas hydrate system in a gas chimney, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 104: 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.023
[56]	Yin X, Zhou H, Yang Q, et al. 2008. The evidence for the existence of methane seepages in the northern South China Sea: abnormal high methane concentrations in bottom waters. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 27(6): 62–70
[57]	Zhang M, Lu H, Guan H, et al. 2018. Methane seepage intensities traced by sulfur isotopes of pyrite and gypsum in sediment from the Shenhu area, South China Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 37(7): 20–27. doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1241-1