+Advanced Search

Advanced Search

An evaluation of input/dissipation terms in WAVEWATCH III using in situ and satellite significant wave height data in the South China Sea

WANG Jichao,  ZHANG Jie,  YANG Jungang,  BAO Wendi,  WU Guoli,  REN Qifeng

downloadPDF
文章导航 > Acta Oceanologica Sinica  > 2017 >  36(3): 20-25
王际朝, 张杰, 杨俊钢, 鲍文娣, 吴国丽, 任启峰. 基于现场和卫星有效波高数据评估WAVEWATCH III的输入/耗散项[J]. 海洋学报英文版, 2017, 36(3): 20-25. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1038-7
引用本文: 王际朝, 张杰, 杨俊钢, 鲍文娣, 吴国丽, 任启峰. 基于现场和卫星有效波高数据评估WAVEWATCH III的输入/耗散项[J]. 海洋学报英文版, 2017, 36(3): 20-25. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1038-7
shu
WANG Jichao, ZHANG Jie, YANG Jungang, BAO Wendi, WU Guoli, REN Qifeng. An evaluation of input/dissipation terms in WAVEWATCH III using in situ and satellite significant wave height data in the South China Sea[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3): 20-25. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1038-7
Citation: WANG Jichao, ZHANG Jie, YANG Jungang, BAO Wendi, WU Guoli, REN Qifeng. An evaluation of input/dissipation terms in WAVEWATCH III using in situ and satellite significant wave height data in the South China Sea[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2017, 36(3): 20-25. doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1038-7
shu

基于现场和卫星有效波高数据评估WAVEWATCH III的输入/耗散项

doi: 10.1007/s13131-017-1038-7
  • 1.

    中国石油大学(华东)理学院, 中国, 青岛, 266580

  • 2.

    国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 中国, 青岛, 266061

  • 3.

    中国海洋大学数学科学学院, 中国, 青岛, 266100

基金项目: The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41406007; the National Key Research and Development Project of China under contract No. 2016YFC1401800; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41306002; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China under contract Nos 16CX02011A and 15CX08011A.

An evaluation of input/dissipation terms in WAVEWATCH III using in situ and satellite significant wave height data in the South China Sea

  • 1.

    College of Science, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China

  • 2.

    The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China

  • 3.

    School of Mathematical Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

    摘要
  • 摘要: 基于WAVEWATCH III，在输入相同的风场条件下，评估了三个输入耗散项WAM3，WAM4以及TC96在是否考虑大气稳定性时的模拟能力。通过5组实验，用南海的测波雷达数据以及研究区域内HY-2高度计的有效波高数据对不同源项的模拟结果进行了比较分析，研究区域为100-135°E，0-35°N。对TC96中的风速校正参数进行了敏感性分析。结果表明，这几种源项在涌浪占主导时的模拟效果都不太理想；考虑大气不稳定性的TC96源项模拟的效果最好；大气不稳定性的影响是以一种所谓的“高效风速”的策略来反映的，其中最重要的一个参数为风速转换参数，这个参数非常敏感，在对特定区域进行模拟之前，应先分析出这个参数的最优值。
    Abstract: A WAVEWATCH III version 3.14 (WW3) wave model is used to evaluate input/dissipation source term packages WAM3, WAM4 and TC96 considering the effect of atmospheric instability. The comparisons of a significant wave height acquired from the model with different packages have been performed based on wave observation radar and HY-2 altimetry significant wave height data through five experiments in the South China Sea domain spanning latitudes of 0°-35°N and longitudes of 100°-135°E. The sensitivity of the wind speed correction parameter in the TC96 package also has been analyzed. From the results, the model is unable to dissipate the wave energy efficiently during a swell propagation with either source packages. It is found that TC96 formulation with the "effective wind speed" strategy performs better than WAM3 and WAM4 formulations. The wind speed correction parameter in the TC96 source package is very sensitive and needs to be calibrated and selected before the WW3 model can be applied to a specific region.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(19)
  • Abdalla S, Bidlot J R. 2002. Wind Gustiness and Air Density Effects and Other Key Changes to Wave Model in CY25R1. ECMWF Research Department Technical Report Memorandum R60.9/SA/0273. England:European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
    Bidlot J R, Abdalla S, Janssen P. 2005. A revised formulation for ocean wave dissipation in CY25R1. ECMWF Research Department Technical Report Memorandum R60.9/JB/0516. England:European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
    Chalikov D V. 1995. The parameterization of the wave boundary layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 25(6):1333-1349
    Chalikov D V, Belevich M Y. 1993. One-dimensional theory of the wave boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 63(1-2):65-96
    Chu P C, Cheng Kuofeng. 2008. South China Sea wave characteristics during typhoon Muifa passage in winter 2004. Journal of Oceanography, 64(1):1-21
    Durrant T H, Greenslade D J M, Simmonds I. 2009. Validation of Jason-1 and Envisat remotely sensed wave heights. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(1):123-134
    Janssen P A E M. 1991. Quasi-linear theory of wind-wave generation applied to wave forecasting. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 21(11):1631-1642
    Kalantzi G D, Gommenginger C, Srokosz M. 2009. Assessing the performance of the dissipation parameterizations in WAVEWATCH III using collocated altimetry data. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 39(11):2800-2819
    Komen G J, Hasselmann S, Hasselmann K. 1984. On the existence of a fully developed wind-sea spectrum. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 14(8):1271-1285
    Lee B C, Fan Y M, Chuang L Z H, et al. 2009. Parametric sensitivity analysis of the WAVEWATCH III model. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 20(2):425-432
    Snyder R L, Dobson F W, Elliott J A, et al. 1981. Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 102:1-59
    The WAMDI Group. 1988. The WAM model-A third generation ocean wave prediction model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18(12):1775-1810
    The WISE Group. 2007. Wave modelling:the state of the art. Progress in Oceanography, 75(4):603-674
    Tolman H L. 2002. Validation of WAVEWATCH III Version 1.15 for a Global Domain. NCEP Technical Note 213. Camp Springs, US:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    Tolman H L. 2009. User Manual and System Documentation of WAVEWATCH IIITM Version 3.14. Technical Note 276. Camp Springs, US:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    Tolman H L, Chalikov D. 1996. Source terms in a third-generation wind wave model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 26(11):2497-2518
    Tolman H L, the WAVEWATCH III Development Group. 2014. User Manual and System Documentation of WAVEWATCH III® Version 4.18. Technical Note 316. Camp Springs, US:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    Törn A, Žilinskas A. 1989. Global Optimization. New York:Springer-Verlag, 255
    Wang Jichao, Zhang Jie, Yang Jungang. 2013. The validation of HY-2 altimeter measurements of a significant wave height based on buoy data. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 32(11):87-90
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1229
  • HTML全文浏览量:  96
  • PDF下载量:  1085
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-04-17
  • 修回日期:  2016-05-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Govern Body: China Association for Science and Technology
    Sponsor: Chinese Society for Oceanography
    Tel: 86-10-62179976
    E-mail: ocean2@hyxb.org.cn
    Website: http://www.aosocean.com/
    京ICP备12043220号-7

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计