The performance of a <i>z</i>-level ocean model in modeling the global tide

XIAO Bin; QIAO Fangli; SHU Qi

doi:10.1007/s13131-016-0884-z

基于z坐标海洋模式的全球正压潮波数值模拟研究

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0884-z

1.
海洋与大气学院, 中国海洋大学, 青岛, 266100;国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 青岛, 266061
2.
国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 青岛, 266061;区域海洋动力学与数值模拟功能实验室, 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室, 青岛, 266071
3.
国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 青岛, 266061

计量
- 文章访问数: 1113
- HTML全文浏览量: 36
- PDF下载量: 514
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-11-07
- 修回日期: 2015-12-08

The performance of a z-level ocean model in modeling the global tide

1.
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China
2.
The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China;Laboratory for Regional Oceanography, Numerical Modeling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China
3.
The First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China

摘要

摘要: 本文基于z坐标海洋模式MOM4建立了全球正压潮波数值模式，研究了不同空间分辨率、地形数据及平滑方法对模拟结果的影响。结果表明，合适的滤波半径可以改善所模拟的全球潮波结构，更高质量的地形数据可以显著降低全球潮波数值模式的潮位均方根误差。敏感实验结果表明，数值模式对水平分辨率较为敏感，其中水平分辨率为0.5°和0.25°的数值模式对M₂分潮迟角的模拟能力相比1°水平分辨的模式提高了35.5%。为了解决全球正压潮波数值模式中动能偏大的问题，引入了地形拖曳参数化方案，对正压潮波数值模式中所不能解析的内波的生成和破碎所导致的潮能耗散进行了合理地参数化。所建立的最终版本的全球正压潮波数值模式相比TPXO7.2的M₂分潮潮位均方根误差为8.5cm。其所模拟的全球M₂和K₁分潮的潮能通量与TPXO7.2吻合的较好，潮能通量的相关系数可以作为衡量数值模式模拟能力的一个重要指标。
- 全球潮波 /
- 数值模拟 /
- 模块化海洋数值模式 /
- 地形拖曳参数化 /
- 全球潮能通量
Abstract: The performance of a z-level ocean model, the Modular Ocean Model Version 4 (MOM4), is evaluated in terms of simulating the global tide with different horizontal resolutions commonly used by climate models. The performance using various sets of model topography is evaluated. The results show that the optimum filter radius can improve the simulated co-tidal phase and that better topography quality can lead to smaller rootmean square (RMS) error in simulated tides. Sensitivity experiments are conducted to test the impact of spatial resolutions. It is shown that the model results are sensitive to horizontal resolutions. The calculated absolute mean errors of the co-tidal phase show that simulations with horizontal resolutions of 0.5° and 0.25° have about 35.5% higher performance compared that with 1° model resolution. An internal tide drag parameterization is adopted to reduce large system errors in the tidal amplitude. The RMS error of the best tuned 0.25° model compared with the satellite-altimetry-constrained model TPXO7.2 is 8.5 cm for M₂. The tidal energy fluxes of M₂ and K₁ are calculated and their patterns are in good agreement with those from the TPXO7.2. The correlation coefficients of the tidal energy fluxes can be used as an important index to evaluate a model skill.
- global tide /
- Modular Ocean Model /
- global tidal energy flux /

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

Accad Y, Pekeris C L. 1978. Solution of the Tidal Equations for the M2 and S2 Tides in the World Oceans from a Knowledge of the Tidal Potential Alone. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 290(1368):235-266

Adcroft A, Hill C, Marshall J. 1997. Representation of topography by shaved cells in a height coordinate ocean model. Mon Weather Rev, 125(9):2293-2315

Antonov J, Seidov D, Boyer T, et al. 2010. World Ocean Atlas 2009, Volume 2:Salinity. S. Levitus, Ed. NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 69

Arbic B K, Garner S T, Hallberg R W, et al. 2004. The accuracy of surface elevations in forward global barotropic and baroclinic tide models. Deep Sea Res Pt Ⅱ, 51(25):3069-3101

Arbic B K, Wallcraft A J, Metzger E J. 2010. Concurrent simulation of the eddying general circulation and tides in a global ocean model. Ocean Modelling, 32(3):175-187

Bell T. 1975. Topographically generated internal waves in the open ocean. J Geophys Res, 80(3):320-327

Eanes R, Bettadpur S. 1995. The CSR 3.0 global ocean tide model. Center for Space Research, Technical Memorandum, CSR-TM-95-06

Egbert G D, Erofeeva S Y. 2002. Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides. J Atmos Ocean Tech, 19(2):183-204

Egbert G D, Ray R D. 2000. Significant dissipation of tidal energy in the deep ocean inferred from satellite altimeter data. Nature, 405(6788):775-778

Egbert G D, Ray R D, Bills B G. 2004. Numerical modeling of the global semidiurnal tide in the present day and in the last glacial maximum. J Geophys Res, 109(C3):C03003

Fretwell P, Pritchard H D, Vaughan D G, et al. 2013. Bedmap2:improved ice bed, surface and thickness data sets for Antarctica. Cryosphere, 7(1):375-393

Griffies S M, Harrison M J, Pacanowski R C, et al. 2004. A technical guide to MOM4. GFDL Ocean Group Tech Rep, 5:371

IOC, IHO, BODC. 2003. Centenary Edition of the GEBCO Digital Atlas, published on CD-ROM on behalf of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the International Hydrographic Organization as part of the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, Liverpool, UK:British Oceanographic Data Centre

Jayne S R, St Laurent L C. 2001. Parameterizing tidal dissipation over rough topography. Geophys Res Lett, 28(5):811-814

Large W G, McWilliams J C, Doney S C. 1994. Oceanic vertical mixing:A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization. Rev Geophys, 32(4):363-403

Le Provost C. 2001. Ocean tides. International Geophysics, 69:267-303

Locarnini R, Mishonov A, Antonov J, et al. 2010. World Ocean Atlas 2009, vol. 1, Temperature, edited by S. Levitus. Washington, DC:US Gov Print Off, 184

Müller M, Haak H, Jungclaus J, et al. 2010. The effect of ocean tides on a climate model simulation. Ocean Modelling, 35(4):304-313

Munk W, Wunsch C. 1998. Abyssal recipes:energetics of tidal and wind mixing. Deep-Sea Research Part Ⅰ, 45(12):1977-2010

Murray R J. 1996. Explicit generation of orthogonal grids for ocean models. J Comput Phys, 126(2):251-273

NGDC. 1988. Data Announcement 88-MGG-02, Digital relief of the Surface of the Earth.. edited. Boulder, Colorado:NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center

NGDC. 2006. 2-minute Gridded Global Relief Data (ETOPO₂v2), edited by U.S. Department of Commerce N. O. a. A. A.. Boulder, Colorado:National Geophysical Data Center

Pacanowski R C, Gnanadesikan A. 1998. Transient response in a zlevel ocean model that resolves topography with partial cells. Mon Weather Rev, 126(12):3248-3270

Pawlowicz R, Beardsley B, Lentz S. 2002. Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE. Comput Geosci-UK, 28(8):929-937

Pekeris C L, Accad Y. 1969. Solution of Laplace's Equations for the M2 Tide in the World Oceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 265(1165):413-436

Schiller A, Fiedler R. 2007. Explicit tidal forcing in an ocean general circulation model. Geophys Res Lett, 34(3):L03611

Schwiderski E W. 1980. On charting global ocean tides. Rev Geophys, 18(1):243-268

Shriver J, Arbic B K, Richman J, et al. 2012. An evaluation of the barotropic and internal tides in a high-resolution global ocean circulation model. J Geophys Res, 117(C10):C10024

Shum C, Woodworth P, Andersen O, et al. 1997. Accuracy assessment of recent ocean tide models. J Geophys Res, 102(C11):25173-25194

Simmons H L, Hallberg R W, Arbic B K. 2004. Internal wave generation in a global baroclinic tide model. Deep Sea Res Pt Ⅱ, 51(25):3043-3068

Smith W H, Sandwell D T. 1997. Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science, 277(5334):1956-1962

Yu H, Wang Z, Kuang L, et al. 2015. A numerical study on the circulation and tide in a zigzag bay. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 34(1):119-128

Wunsch C. 1975. Internal tides in the ocean. Rev Geophys, 13(1):167-182

Wang Yihang, Fang Guohong, Wei Zexun, et al. 2010. Accuracy assessment of global ocean tide models base on satellite altimetry(in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 25(4):353-359

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1113
HTML全文浏览量: 36
PDF下载量: 514
被引次数: 0

基于z坐标海洋模式的全球正压潮波数值模拟研究

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0884-z

计量

出版历程

The performance of a z-level ocean model in modeling the global tide

计量

出版历程

目录