Morphological and molecular discrimination of green macroalgae <i>Chaetomorpha aerea</i> and <i>C. linum</i>

HUANG Bingxin; TENG Linhong; DING Lanping

doi:10.1007/s13131-016-0841-x

海洋绿藻气生硬毛藻(Chaetomorpha aerea)和线形硬毛藻(C. linum)的形态与分子鉴定

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0841-x

1.
天津市动植物抗性重点实验室, 生命科学学院, 天津师范大学, 天津 300387, 中国;中国科学院海洋研究所, 青岛 266071, 中国;汕头大学, 汕头 515063, 中国
2.
中国科学院海洋研究所, 青岛 266071, 中国;中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049, 中国

基金项目: The National Key Technology R & D Program of China under contract No.2012BAC07B05; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 31400186, 31270257 and 31093440; the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong Province under contract No.2012A020200007; the Science and Technology Plan Project of Shantou City, China under contract No.2012-171.

计量
- 文章访问数: 1328
- HTML全文浏览量: 62
- PDF下载量: 2518
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-01-13
- 修回日期: 2015-08-07

Morphological and molecular discrimination of green macroalgae Chaetomorpha aerea and C. linum

1.
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Animal and Plant Resistance, College of Life Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China;Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;Marine Biology Institute, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
2.
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

摘要

摘要: 海洋大型绿藻气生硬毛藻(Chaetomorpha aerea)和线形硬毛藻(C. linum)在分类方面易引起混淆。针对这个问题,我们尝试通过形态与分子分析来区分这两个种。气生硬毛藻和线形硬毛藻能通过形态特征区分,如藻体形态、细胞形状与大小、细胞长宽比(LWR)及细胞壁收缢等。气生硬毛藻的藻体一般向基纤细,上部直径270-500μm,中部直径160-360μm,下部直径100-160μm;在上部,细胞的长小于宽;细胞壁常常在横隔处收缢,使得丝体呈珠状。而线形硬毛藻的藻体在相同个体上常常直径为稳定的90-300μm,细胞圆柱状或桶状,细胞壁常不收缢;其LWR比气生硬毛藻的大。分子分析结果表明,这两个种的18S rRNA基因差异为3.6%-3.7%、ITS为53.5%-54.3%。在系统发育上,它们分布在较远的进化支上,证明在分子水平上具有遗传差异。另外,形态学数据表明,线形硬毛藻样品的藻体直径变化大,范围达到90μm-300μm。因此,建议这两个种作为独立种处理。
- 气生硬毛藻Chaetomorphaaerea /
- 线形硬毛藻Chaetomorphalinum /
- 分子鉴定 /
- 形态比较 /
- 18SrRNA /
- ITS
Abstract: Green macroalgae Chaetomorpha aerea and C. linum are taxonomically confused. In this paper, we tried morphological and molecular analyses to separate these two species. C. aerea and C. linum can be distinguished from morphological characteritics, such as frond dimension, cells size and shape, their mean length/width ratios(LWR), and cell walls constriction. Thalli of C. aerea attenuate basipetally, with diameter 270-500μm at upper portion, 160-360μm at middle portion, 100-160μm at basal portion. For the upper part, the length of cells is less than their diameter. Cell walls usually constrict at the dissepiments, which are pellucid or colorless and give the filament beaded appearance. In contrast, thalli of C. linum often have a constant diameter of 90-300μm within the same individual, cell walls usually do not constrict and cells are cylindrical or barrel shaped. The LWR is larger than that of C. aerea. Results show that the pairwise distance between two species is 3.6%-3.7% for 18S rRNA gene and 53.5%-54.3% for ITS region. In phylogeny, they distribute at distant clades, which confirms a genetic divergence at molecular level. In addition, morphological data indicates that filament diameter of C. linum samples is highly variable, ranging from 90μm to 300μm. Then these two species can be considered as separate species.
- Chaetomorpha aerea /
- Chaetomorpha linum /
- molecular identification /
- morphology comparison /
- 18S rRNA /
- ITS

HTML全文

参考文献(39)

Bakker F T, Olsen J L, Stam W T, et al. 1992. Nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer regions(ITS1 and ITS2) define dis-crete biogeographic groups in Cladophora-albida(Chloro-phyta). Journal of Phycology, 28(6):839-845

Bakker F T, Olsen J L, Stam W T, et al. 1994. The Cladophora complex(Chlorophyta):New views based on 18S rRNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 3(4):365-382

Bakker F T, Olsen J L, Stam W T. 1995a. Evolution of nuclear rDNA its sequences in the Cladophora albida/sericea clade(Chloro-phyta). Journal of Molecular Evolution, 40(6):640-651

Bakker F T, Olsen J L, Stam W T. 1995b. Global phylogeography in the cosmopolitan species Cladophora vagabunda(Chlorophyta) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. European Journal of Phycology, 30(3):197-208

Blair S M. 1983. Taxonomic treatment of the Chaetomorpha and Rhizoclonium species(Cladophorales, Chlorophyta) in new-England. Rhodora, 85(842):175-211

Blair S M, Mathieson A C, Cheney D P. 1982. Morphological and Elec-trophoretic investigations of selected species of Chaetomorpha(Chlorophyta; Cladophorales). Phycologia, 21(2):164-172

Burrows E M. 1991. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 2 Chloro-phyta. London:Natural History Museum Publications

Chiang Y M. 1960. Marine algae of northern Taiwan(Cyanophyta, Chlorophyta, Phaeophyta). Taiwania, 7(1):51-75

Christensen T. 1957. Chaetomorpha linum in the attached state. Bot-anisk Tidsskrift, 53:311-316

Collins F S. 1909. The green algae of North America. Tufts College Studies, Scientific Series, 2(3):79-480

Collins F S. 1918. The green algae of North America. Second supple-mentary paper. Tufts College Studies, Scientific Series, 4(7):1-106

Dillwyn L W. 1806. British Conferv.; or, Colored Figures and De-scriptions of the British Plants Referred by Botanists to the Genus Conferva. London:W. Phillips

Hall T A. 1999. BioEdit:a user-friendly biological sequence align-ment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nuc-leic Acids Symposium Series, 41:95-98

John D M, Lawson G W, Ameka G K. 2003. The Marine Macroalgae of the Tropical West Africa Sub-region:Beihefte zur Nova Hed-wigia. Berlin:J. Cramer, 125:1-217

John D M, van Reine W F P, Lawson G W, et al. 2004. A Taxonomic and Geographical Catalogue of the Seaweeds of the Western Coast of Africa and Adjacent Islands:Beihefte zur Nova Hed-wigia. Berlin:J. Cramer, 127:1-339

Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucle-otide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16(2):111-120

Kornmann P. 1972. Ein Beitrag zur Taxonomie der Gattung Chaeto-morpha(Cladophorales, Chlorophyta). Helgol.nder wis-senschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 23(1):1-31

Kützing F T. 1845. Phycologia Germanica, d.i. Deutschlands Algen in bündigen Beschreibungen. Nebst einer Anleitung zum Unter-suchen und Bestimmen dieser Gew.chse für Anf.nger.. Nord-hausen:W. K.hne, 1-340

Kützing F T. 1849. Species Algarum. pp.[i]-vi,[1]-922. Lipsiae[Leipzig], Germany:F. A. Brockhaus

Lawson G W, John D W. 1987. The marine algae and coastal environ-ment of tropical West Africa(Second Edition). Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 93:vi + 1-415

Li R G. 1964. Marine Green algae of Lüda, Liaoning Province. Jilin Normal University Journal(in Chinese),(1):91-106

Luan R X. 1989. Field Guide of Marine Algae Along Dalian Coast(in Chinese). Dalian:Dalian Maritime University Press, 1-129

Mathieson A C, Norton T A, Neushul M. 1981. The taxonomic implic-ations of genetic and environmentally induced variations in seaweed morphology. The Botanical Review, 47(3):313-347

Noda M. 1971. Flora of Chinese northeastern region(Manchuria):I. Algae of the North Eastern China and Korea. Kazama study Co., Ltd., 1383-1601

Patel R J. 1971. Cytotaxonomical studies on Chaetomorpha linum(OF. Müll.) Kütz. and C. aerea(Dillwyn) Kütz.. Phykos, 11:17-22

Price W M. 1967. Some aspects of the biology and taxonomy of the unbranched Cladophorales in the British Islands[dissertation]. England:University of Liverpool

Rosenvinge L K. 1893. Gr.nlands Havalger. Meddelser om Gr.nland, 3:763-981

Silva P C, Basson P W, Moe R L. 1996. Catalogue of the Benthic Mar-ine Algae of the Indian Ocean. Botany:University of California Publications, 79:1-1259

Sinha J P. 1958. Chromosome numbers and life cycles in members of Cladophorales. British Phycological Journal, 1:24-27

Swofford D L. 2002. PAUP^*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony(^* and other methods). Sunderland, Massachusetts:Sinauer Asso-ciates

Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, et al. 2007. MEGA4:Molecular evolution-ary genetics analysis(MEGA) Software Version 4. 0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24(8):1596-1599

Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Plewniak F, et al. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface:flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Re-search, 25(24):4876-4882

Tseng C K. 1936. Studies on the marine Chlorophyceae from Hainan. Chinese Marine Biological Bulletin, 1:129-200

Tseng C K. 1938. Studies on the marine Chlorophyceae from Hainan, Ⅱ. Lingn Sci J, 17(2):141-149

Tseng C K. 1983. Common Seaweeds of China. Beijing:Science Press Tseng C K, Li L C. 1935. Some marine algae from Tsingtao and Che-foo, Shantung. Bulletin of the Fan Memorial Institute of Bio-logy(Botany), 6(4):183-235

Womersley H B S. 1984. The Marine Benthic Flora of Southern Aus-tralia. Part I. Adelaide:Government Printer, South Australia, 1-329

Womersley H B S, Bailey A. 1970. Marine algae of the Solomon Is-lands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of B:Bio-logical Sciences, 259(830):257-352

Yoshida T. 1998. Marine Algae of Japan. Tokyo:Uchida Rokakuho Publishing Co., Ltd., 1-1222

Zhou Z Y, Chen Z H. 1983. A list of marine algae from Fujian coast. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait(in Chinese), 2(2):91-102

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1328
HTML全文浏览量: 62
PDF下载量: 2518
被引次数: 0

海洋绿藻气生硬毛藻(Chaetomorpha aerea)和线形硬毛藻(C. linum)的形态与分子鉴定

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0841-x

计量

出版历程

Morphological and molecular discrimination of green macroalgae Chaetomorpha aerea and C. linum

计量

出版历程

目录