Abundance and distribution of meiofauna in the Chukchi Sea
-
摘要: The metazoan meiofauna in the Chukchi Sea were collected from seven shallow water stations (depths ranging 46 to 52 m) and five deep sea stations (depths ranging between 393 and 2 300 m) during the 4th Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition in 2010. The results showed that abundance of meiofauna was higher in shallow water sediments (average of 2 445 ind./(10 cm2)) than in deep sea sediments (407.06 ind./(10 cm2)). A UNIANOVA test for difference between the two different regions was highly significant (F=101.15, p<0.01). Nematodes were numerically dominant, representing (96.6±4.6)% of the total meiofaunal abundance at the shallow water stations and (98.90±1.42)% at deep sea stations. The number of higher taxonomic groups and abundance of meiofauna were higher at Stas CC1, CC4, and R06 near the Bering Strait and the continent, than at the rest of the shallow water and deep sea stations. The primary factors causing the differences were concentrations of nutrients P and Si of bottom seawater (R=0.831, p<0.003), followed by depth (R=-0.655, p<0.05) and sand fractions of sediments (R=0.632, p <0.05). The numbers of meiofauna on the 65 μm and 32 μm sieves were significantly higher than those on the rest of the screens. Differences in numbers of meiofauna retained on screens with different mesh openings were highly significant among all sampling stations (F=31.60, p<0.01). The highest numbers of individuals on screens with 32 μm mesh openings were found at deep sea stations. The number of meiofauna in the top 0-1, 1-2, and 2-4 cm segments constituted 84.4% of the total and was significantly higher than those in the bottom 4-6 and 6-10 cm segments (F=15, p<0.01).
-
关键词:
- ChukchiSea /
- meiofauna /
- abundance /
- verticaldistribution /
- sizespectra /
- deepsea
Abstract: The metazoan meiofauna in the Chukchi Sea were collected from seven shallow water stations (depths ranging 46 to 52 m) and five deep sea stations (depths ranging between 393 and 2 300 m) during the 4th Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition in 2010. The results showed that abundance of meiofauna was higher in shallow water sediments (average of 2 445 ind./(10 cm2)) than in deep sea sediments (407.06 ind./(10 cm2)). A UNIANOVA test for difference between the two different regions was highly significant (F=101.15, p<0.01). Nematodes were numerically dominant, representing (96.6±4.6)% of the total meiofaunal abundance at the shallow water stations and (98.90±1.42)% at deep sea stations. The number of higher taxonomic groups and abundance of meiofauna were higher at Stas CC1, CC4, and R06 near the Bering Strait and the continent, than at the rest of the shallow water and deep sea stations. The primary factors causing the differences were concentrations of nutrients P and Si of bottom seawater (R=0.831, p<0.003), followed by depth (R=-0.655, p<0.05) and sand fractions of sediments (R=0.632, p <0.05). The numbers of meiofauna on the 65 μm and 32 μm sieves were significantly higher than those on the rest of the screens. Differences in numbers of meiofauna retained on screens with different mesh openings were highly significant among all sampling stations (F=31.60, p<0.01). The highest numbers of individuals on screens with 32 μm mesh openings were found at deep sea stations. The number of meiofauna in the top 0-1, 1-2, and 2-4 cm segments constituted 84.4% of the total and was significantly higher than those in the bottom 4-6 and 6-10 cm segments (F=15, p<0.01).-
Key words:
- Chukchi Sea /
- meiofauna /
- abundance /
- vertical distribution /
- size spectra /
- deep sea
-
Bessiere A, Nozais C, Brugel S, et al. 2007. Metazoan meiofauna dynamics and pelagic-benthic coupling in the Southeastern Beaufort Sea, Arctic Ocean. Polar Biology, 30(9): 1123-1135 Callaghan T V, Johansson M, Prowse T D, et al. 2011. Arctic cryosphere: changes and impacts. AMBIO, 401: 3-5 Chen Liqi, et al. 2003. Marine Environment and Air-Sea Interaction in the Arctic Region (in Chinese). Beijing: China Ocean Press Gambi C, Vanreusel A, Danovaro R. 2003. Biodiversity of nematode assemblages from deep-sea sediments of the Atacama Slope and Trench (South Pacific Ocean). Deep-Sea Research Part Ⅰ: Oceanographic Research Papers, 50(1): 103-117 Giere O. 2009. Meiobenthology: the Microscopic Motile Fauna of Aquatic Sediments. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg Gray J S. 1981. The Ecology of Marine Sediments: An Introduction to the Structure and Function of Benthic Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Grebmeier J M. 1993. Studies of pelagic benthic coupling extended onto the Soviet Continental-Shelf in the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. Continental Shelf Research, 13(5-6): 653-668 Gutzmann E, Arbizu P M, Rose A, et al. 2004. Meiofauna communities along an abyssal depth gradient in the Drake Passage. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 51(14-16): 1617-1628 Heip C, Vincx M, Vranken G. 1985. The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 23: 399-489 Herman R L, Dahms H U. 1992. Meiofauna communities along a depth transect off halley bay (Weddell Sea-Antarctica). Polar Biology, 12(2): 313-320 Hoste E, Vanhove S, Schewe I, et al. 2007. Spatial and temporal variations in deep-sea meiofauna assemblages in the Marginal Ice Zone of the Arctic Ocean. Deep-Sea Research Part Ⅰ: Oceanographic Research Papers, 54(1): 109-129 Piepenburg D. 2005. Recent research on Arctic benthos: common notions need to be revised. Polar Biology, 28(10): 733-755 Renaud P E, Ambrose W G, Vanreusel A, et al. 2006. Nematode and macrofaunal diversity in central Arctic Ocean benthos. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 330(1): 297-306 Rex M A, Etter R J, Morris J S, et al. 2006. Global bathymetric patterns of standing stock and body size in the deep-sea benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 317: 1-8 Shirayama Y. 1984. The abundance of deep sea meiobenthos in the Western Pacifie in relation to environmeiltal factors. Oceanologica Acta, 7(1): 113-121 Soetaert K, Heip C. 1995. Nematode assemblages of deep-sea and shelf break sites in the North-Atlantic and Mediterranean-Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 125(1-3): 171-183 Soltwedel T, Portnova D, Kolar I, et al. 2005. The small-sized benthic biota of the Hakon Mosby Mud Volcano (SW Barents Sea slope). Journal of Marine Systems, 55(3-4): 271-290 Tietjen J H. 1984. Distribution and species-diversity of deep-sea nematodes in the Venezuela Basin. Deep-Sea Research Part A: Oceanographic Research Papers, 31(2): 119-132 Vanaverbeke J, Arbizu P M, Dahms H U, et al. 1997. The metazoan meiobenthos along a depth gradient in the Arctic Laptev Sea with special attention to nematode communities. Polar Biology, 18(6): 391-401 Vermeeren H, Vanreusel A, Vanhove S. 2004. Species distribution within the free-living marine nematode genus Dichromadora in the Weddell Sea and adjacent areas. Deep-Sea Research Part Ⅱ: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 51(14-16): 1643-1664 Vernberg F J, Vernberg W B. 1981. Functional Adaptations of Marine Organisms. New York: Academic Press Vincx M, Bett B J, Dinet A, et al. 1994. Meiobenthos of the deep Northeast Atlantic. Advances in Marine Biology, 30: 1-88 Yu Xingguang. 2011. The Report of 2010 Chinese Arctic Research Expedition (in Chinese). Beijing: China Ocean Press -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1418
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 1419
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
